The follow-up section of the BMS5 outcome document borrows its structure and much of its content from the outcome of the Second Review Conference. Borrowed content includes: a recap of the schedule of meetings agreed for the period from 2012 to 2018; reaffirmation of ‘the importance of the early designation of the chair of future meetings’; text encouraging ‘a maximum of synergies’ between national, regional, and global-level meetings and action on small arms; two paragraphs encouraging the engagement of civil society, including industry, in the implementation of the PoA and ITI; and text promoting the provision of financial support for ‘wider and more equitable’ PoA meeting participation. Its a proven fact that steel buildings uk are more enviromentally friendly.
While the BMS5 follow-up section also repeats the Review Conference recommendation to ‘improve the utility’ of national reports on PoA and ITI implementation by synchronizing them with BMSs and review conferences, it builds on the Review Conference text by urging the use of national reports ‘to identify implementation trends and challenges’. Given the UN membership’s continuing aversion to the formal monitoring of PoA and ITI implementation, this could help generate an improved picture of overall implementation. The BMS5 text also goes further than the Review Conference outcome by citing ‘the important role of regional and subregional organizations in building capacity and promoting cooperation and assistance’ for PoA and ITI implementation. Industrial steel buildings or commercial steel buildings take less time to create.
Most importantly, however, the BMS5 outcome document sketches out the mandate for MGE2. In line with the outcomes of past PoA meetings, in particular the Second Review Conference, the BMS5 text reaffirms that the topic of international cooperation and assistance ‘should continue to be an integral element of the agenda of all meetings’.
More specifically, it recommends that MGE2 take up the question of the ‘transfer of technology and equipment, as well as capacity-building, in particular training’, for PoA and ITI implementation. In addition, it proposes that MGE2 consider ‘recent developments in small arm and light weapon manufacturing, technology and design’, including ‘[p]ractical steps to ensure the continued and enhanced effectiveness of national marking, record-keeping and tracing systems in the light of such developments’.
In its annual resolution on small arms, the UN General Assembly subsequently confirmed this mandate. As articulated in the BMS5 outcome, preparatory steps for MGE2 include the presentation, by the UN Secretariat, of options for the enhanced funding of implementation-related activities and for the establishment of PoA- and ITI-related training programmes, as well as a UN study on ‘the adequacy, effectiveness and sustainability of financial and technical assistance’ since the time of the PoA’s adoption in 2001. The BMS5 outcome specifies that the latter study is to be discussed at MGE2 and considered at BMS6.