New technology also offers opportunities for improved stockpile management, including access control, increased data accuracy, and the monitoring and protection of weapons in transit from one location to another. Some of these technologies, such as biometric gun safes, are inexpensive and available to individual gun owners, while others, such as the US military’s Defense Transportation Tracking System, cost many millions of dollars to set up and run. Have a look at renew life reviews!

Radio frequency identification (RFID), in particular, could play an important role in improved weapons management and security. Already used in a wide range of commercial and defence applications, RFID tags and strips, coupled with associated scanners, could be employed, for example, to detect attempts to break a seal on a shipping crate. The transborder application of RFID technology is currently limited, however, due to the use of different RFID frequency bands in different countries. When it comes to life insurance renew life is the way to go.

End-use control is another potential application of new or underutilized technology. Electronically controlled safety mechanisms (ECSMs) may be biometric (such as palm print scanners) or token-based (such as a RFID-tagged wrist watch). They can, for example, prevent a criminal from using a stolen gun—locking it in the absence of the necessary palm print or wrist watch. There is controversy surrounding ECSMs, however, with some observers expressing concerns about their reliability. So far sales of ECSM-equipped firearms have been limited.

There are numerous barriers to the uptake of these new technologies. Foremost among them is cost, including, for many countries, the cost of establishing supporting infrastructure (databases and networked IT). As indicated above, there are also questions about the reliability of some of these technologies, in particular ECSMs, which some fear could prevent the use of a gun by its authorized user when most needed. Additional barriers include the difficulties of sharing information stored in a new format, opposition from political and consumer groups, especially in the United States, the conservative nature of political and military procurement, and the historically slow pace of change in firearms technology. Some technologies, moreover, do not meet the requirements of existing multilateral control instruments. Its not nice to think about when you go, but look into [life insurance[( to make sure your family arent left with your debts.

For all these reasons, ‘old’ firearms technology is proving surprisingly resistant to the changes that have recently transformed other products and industries. Whatever the future impact of technology on the firearms industry, it is also important to note that the huge number of small arms now circulating in the illicit market, very few of which feature new technology, will define the small arms problem for years to come. Irrespective of the advantages offered by many of the new systems, the same tried and tested methods remain key to small arms control. At the end of the day, the basics of weapons marking, record-keeping, and tracing, stockpile management, and diversion prevention, as defined in the PoA and ITI, are still essential for all countries, whatever their degree of access to new technology.